Worldcoin price

It is interesting to compare L1 FDV to the closest app FDV ignoring memes. Sui closer but no idea any stats on Deep For ETH WLD technically on OP, so can use Ondo(9B) SOL FDV - 100B Render - 2.5B FDV SUI - 37B Deep - 1.7B FDV Ethereum - 200B FDV Worldcoin - 11B FDV

Is SBF the most underrated investment genius of the past five years? You might only remember his fraud, but the projects he bet on delivered explosive returns 😱😱 👉🏻 Anthropic: Seed round, current valuation $60B+, potential return $10B~$20B (40x) 👉🏻 Cursor: AI coding dark horse, seed round, current valuation $10B+, potential return $1.5B (300x) 👉🏻 Robinhood: Bottomed out in 2022 with $546M, stock price rose from $9.70 to $60, could have netted $3B+ 👉🏻 Worldcoin: Early entry, current valuation around $10B, potential return $250M+ Suddenly feels like SBF just lost to time, Given more time, he might have turned everything around.

After the PI founder participated in the crypto conference Consensus 2025, I have some personal views: First, a question: Why was PI founder Nicolas arranged in the AI panel? In my view, during this conference, Nicolas has already explained what PI really is. In my opinion, PI is not simply about mobile mining. He is addressing the issue of BTC's inability to integrate into real-world countries. It is now very clear that no matter how autonomous and economically free BTC is, it cannot surpass the government. In simple terms, PI is building a foundational infrastructure for the entire crypto community's government administrative department, serving as identity verification for the entire network. The actual decentralization is about removing human management and turning to centralized AI management, allowing the crypto community to truly have a manager, and that manager is AI. This way, it can be completely transparent, open, and compliant, not just transparent in the areas you care about. Your private cash can be transparent to your wife, but is it equally transparent to your mistress? It's not about what you think is transparent money, but everything. Continuing, the "key point" is that it is now known that PI surpasses a project, which is WLD. What Altman couldn't achieve has already been accomplished by Nicolas, and everyone has tokens, everyone is doing real KYC. WLD is suspected of stealing identities, but PI won't, because PI is doing decentralized KYC, managed by AI, so he mentioned face verification. Key points: 1. You cannot sell your identity; what you sell is the PI you earned through hard work, unlike WLD. 2. You cannot misuse someone else's identity; your identity in the virtual currency world is always yours, and you must protect the value of your identity yourself. I believe the focus of the Consensus conference on PI highlights that PI is building a crypto store, based on the important infrastructure of entering the crypto world with a real identity like APPLE. If you want to participate in the crypto world, you must establish your real identity, not a virtual one. It's not about any project creating something first and then trying to patch KYC, which will always lead to fake KYC issues. PI completely solves this problem, and Nicolas has stated compliance with identity for many years. Secondly, regarding the price aspect, how to view the price, to me, price is a matter of human behavior. Most people hope for price increases due to a large amount of unused liquidity, and once activated, the price will soar, which is the key to systematic pricing. As for whether short-term speculation can suppress prices, of course, it can, as long as you have enough professional ability to deceive short-term speculators, it's all free. However, the price is ultimately systematically determined, and no matter how whales speculate, it does not affect the final decentralized price determination. So in the short term, when I see whales trying to manipulate and suppress prices, I will announce the time of whale suppression in advance. Most people always use price to view everything, can this be done? Then let me ask, when a couple argues and throws things, and you want to determine how long the argument will last, if an analyst tells you that as long as they throw a $10,000 computer, they will stop arguing. Would you say this analyst is XX? If arguments were evaluated based on the value of thrown items, would they still argue? Then if it's someone else's watermelon being thrown, how to price it? You might say, why use an argument as an example. This is because you don't think the main force's speculation is manipulating the emotions of retail investors and building a bunch of techniques to try to make you do meaningless analysis. In fact, speculators know they are playing with your mindset. And you're still using numbers to calculate why your wife is angry. Trust me, you're definitely not as professional as physicist Hawking, who spent his life calculating and found the most complex thing is a woman's heart. Similarly, I saw PCT would release an announcement in the morning, and indeed it was released at 7 AM, just like before. Once I see an announcement is going to be released, it is released in the morning of that day. Although this announcement is almost useless and equivalent to not being released, it was indeed announced. #PI #BTC #consensus2025

A whopping 700%+ increase in supported assets over 1 year - @chainlink's Data Streams are setting a new standard - and now $ALT is on the list! Smarter, faster, low-latency feeds = huge unlock for rollup builders using AltLayer infra. Feelin' bullish!

New assets supported by #Chainlink Data Streams ↓ ALT - @alt_layer AR - @ArweaveEco BLAST - @blast BOME - Book of Meme IMX - @Immutable NOT - @thenotcoin PAXG - @Paxos RENDER - @rendernetwork STRK - @Starknet WLD - @worldcoin XAI - @XAI_GAMES